日志
发表评论 评论 (5 个评论)
- 回复 sujie_alex
- 美国除了国有和私有，还有哪些所有制形式？
- 回复 meistersinger
- 那里弄来的？
看看联储局自己怎么说的。
The Federal Reserve, like many other central banks, is an independent government agency but also one that is ultimately accountable to the public and the Congress. The Congress established maximum employment and stable prices as the key macroeconomic objectives for the Federal Reserve in its conduct of monetary policy. The Congress also structured the Federal Reserve to ensure that its monetary policy decisions focus on achieving these long-run goals and do not become subject to political pressures that could lead to undesirable outcomes. So, members of the Board of Governors are appointed for staggered 14-year terms and the Chairman of the Board is appointed for a four-year term. Elected officials and members of the Administration are not allowed to serve on the Board.
The Federal Reserve does not receive funding through the congressional budgetary process. The Fed's income comes primarily from the interest on government securities that it has acquired through open market operations. Other sources of income are the interest on foreign currency investments held by the Federal Reserve System; fees received for services provided to depository institutions, such as check clearing, funds transfers, and automated clearinghouse operations; and interest on loans to depository institutions. After paying its expenses, the Federal Reserve turns the rest of its earnings over to the U.S. Treasury.
- 回复 陈营
- 中国人在这类事务面前的逻辑混乱是极为夸张的。这个世界上的很多词语并不能精准表达一个具体明确的事务或概念，但是太多的人却轻而易举的“望文生义”。私，这个字眼包含的内容绝不是“个人的”这么简单。私有，中国人最容易解释为“个人所有”，尽管这不是错误的解释，但远不是一个全面的解释。其实美联储这样的机构，用“公有私有”或者“国有私有”这样的字眼都极容易让中国人在逻辑上彻底混乱。我以为换一个提法会好些。那就是“民间机构”。只是中国人的概念中“民间机构”对社会政治经济不该有重大甚至绝对的影响力，而事实上美联储这类玩意儿并不是中国人概念和逻辑上的样子。再者，由于国家制度的不同，美国的政府机构并不能全面控制美国，真正控制美国的不是政府，是其背后的财阀资本，这一点也是中国人最搞不清的，这与几千年来中国政府对国家的绝对控制是根本不同的，也是美国和西方国家最具欺骗性的东东。
