July 3 ， 2012 Eva Chen 陳怡樺 CEO of TrendMicro 10101 N. De Anza Blvd. Cupertino , CA 95014 Dear Ms. Chen, Many users of ZhenZhuBay.com and OHaiWan.com (hereafter " ZhenZhuBay websites ") have reported that TrendMicro's security software falsely reports the two websites as "Spam" type and being "Dangerous". (See attached screenshot). In addition, TrendMicro has blocked their access to the ZhenZhuBay websites. As the owner of said websites, I have submitted multiple online requests to TrendMicro for correcting the false characterization. Our users also reportedly submitted correction requests to TrendMicro. So far, TrendMicro has done nothing to remedy the situation. ZhenZhuBay.com is an online Chinese community populated by elite Chinese scholars and persons of high learning. Its system runs on secured Linux servers located in Northern California. I have personally performed a virus scan on the system, and found no issues whatsoever. Internet security services more reputable than TrendMicro found no problems with ZhenZhuBay websites. Specifically, Symantec's Norton Safe Web has reviewed ZhenZhuBay.com and found ZERO threats. McAfee (Intel)'s SiteAdvisor also found no problems with the site. (See attached screenshots taken on July 3, 2012). Since you are Chinese, I invite you over to ZhenZhuBay.com and check it out yourself. TrendMicro's false statement that the ZhenZhuBay websites are "Dangerous" and of "Spam" type has resulted in blocking of access to the sites and loss of associated commercial benefits and advantages. Such false statements may constitute commercial defamation. I hereby request that TrendMicro immediately correct the mischaracterization. Failure to do so may result in legal action, seeking injunctive relief and damages. Sincerely, Dongxiao Yue, Ph.D. attachments:
李永案进展--法官可以突然撤销案件而不理睬主要诉讼条例吗？ 李告麻省医院非法把她关押在精神科的案件突然被法庭撤诉。出奇的是医院作为被告并没有发动议要求撤诉，针对李永的修改诉讼(amended complaint)状, 医院只回应了一个ANSWER。只有三个医生作为被告发了撤诉动议。法官可好，在允许接受这三个医生的动议的同时，撤诉了整个案件，至此，原告告医院的几 条从没有被法官碰过：第一条种族歧视，第三条违反医疗程序，第四条违反州法。案件已经没了。具体过程如下： 09/06/2011 李永递交诉讼状，告医院种族歧视(count 1)，(count 2 社会保险)，告医院和三个医生违反医疗程序(count 3)，告医院违反州法(count 4)； 然后三个医生和医院分别发动议要求撤诉count 3 违反医疗程序；医院还要求撤销第四条违反州发。医院没有回应count 1种族歧视； 12/01/2011 李永递交修改诉讼状 (#25), 放弃第二条count 2； 12/15/2011 医院递交回应(ANSWER #26)，是针对count 1 种族歧视和 count 4 违反州法的； 12/23/2011 李永发动议(#27)要求法庭解释，为什么法庭书记员发电邮告知李永，这案件要被撤诉，但是被告并没有发新的动议呀。 01/03/2012 助理法官建议(#29)给被告时间发动议，针对原告的修改诉讼状。法官允许(#30)。 02/10/2012 三个被告医生发动议(#31，#33，#35)要求撤诉第三条，违反医疗程序。医院还是没有发任何动议。 02/24/2012 原告李永反对(#39)三个医生的动议。 05/18/2012 助理法官建议(#45)接受三个医生的撤诉动议。原告没有反对。医院作为被告，还是没有回应。 06/29/2012 法官 GORTON 接受助理法官的建议(#46)，允许三个医生的动议。(这指令在07/02/2012才输入法庭数据库) 07/02/2012 法庭随即撤销整个案件，案件关闭。 助理法官建议 (#45) 在此： http://www.scribd.com/doc/98940045/045 Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 7/5/2012 at 10:36 AM EDT and filed on 7/5/2012 Case Name: Li v. Huffman et al Case Number: 1:11-cv-11557-NMG Filer: Document Number: No document attached Docket Text: Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. The order dismissing the case was entered in error. The case has been re-opened. (Moore, Kellyann)
你是我的珍珠 你那温柔的一回眸 足以让我明白 你就是我的珍珠 你那修长苗条的身影 轻盈地 在我面前走过 你的 热 情 和自信 早已让我注目 你那优雅的风度 哦 , 那迷人的曲线 不由得让我一见钟情 你的形体 在那柔软光滑的丝裙里 充分显露 你再不要 问我为什么 你就是我的珍珠 我徘徊在这里 欣赏我美丽的珍珠 因为你在水中发光 你甜蜜了我的梦 原文: You're A Pearl by Ridgewalker One glance was enough for me to realize that you're a pearl Slim and tall you walk by so swiftly. Yet I was captured by exuberance, and confidence You're sheer elegance O, those curves they're mesmerizing. Your figure is so full that the silk-smooth dress is stretched to its max Now you can see how I figured out you're a pearl I come here often to marvel at the pearl that sweetens my dreams and glisters in the water
标签: 的
